happy
Site Supporter
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2012
- Messages
- 3,344
- Reaction score
- 9
- Points
- 38
- Location
- Switzerland
Yes, that's a fun quote! It's particularly entertaining when an organization (the British gov't in this case) bans something 'for everyone's benefit/safety,' and then that same organization's statistics show that doing so was significantly harmful overall.
I am thoroughly versed in the misapplication of numerical data, unfortunately. In this case, the most-likely perpetrators of same should be expected to be the British gov't, as they have a vested interest in making sure the statistics support their ban. That they dramatically show the opposite suggests, at least superficially, that the data indeed indicate what was stated. If none of us have any further information about the stats, then we're all left to our own pet conspiracy theories.
The thing worse than allowing firearms is allowing nincompoops to own one.
Sometimes it is good that firearms are banned from certain populations and countries.
My philosophy is this: if you wanna be armed, make sure you are trained and safe.
Same goes to riders with powerful motorcycles and people who take up Golf.