Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: Suspension too hard on modern motorcycles.

  1. #1
    Senior Member Griff's Avatar
    Bike: X-Adventure, Triumph Explorer 1200, 1989 Honda Dominator
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Wicklow Ireland
    Posts
    1,708

    Smile Suspension too hard on modern motorcycles.

    This has been my experience. I am finding it particularly as I get older and my lower back gets more tender. It could be said that this is the only reason I am saying this but I am also beginning to see mutterings of a similar nature on magazines here and there.

    My first inkling of this issue was when I purchased a KTM 690R Enduro new in 2010. The shock on that bike was so hard that in the first few thousand kms I actually considered changing it. We are talking about a WP so called top end item here. In the end I totally backed off the compression and rebound damping on that shock and was persuaded to live with it a bit longer. Finally at a point somewhere between 10 and 15,000kms it started to soften sufficiently to be lived with. Bad show KTM

    Then on to my former NC700X. Same issue albeit not quite as severe. There was far too much high speed compression damping in the forks and shock. As such I went down the route of changing the suspension but the forks never worked properly.

    My former Triumph 1200 Explorer had a front end that was almost solid ! Again work was required to soften it up.

    My current X-Adv, somewhat same issue with excessive compression damping albeit it is now easing at 17,000kms but wasn't as severe as the NC

    Suzuki DL1000A 2016. Fairly decent shock but again a front end that is too hard necessitating the back off of all damping to compensate.

    A friend recently purchased a current Yamaha Tracer 900GT and again complains about overly hard suspension. I could go on and on........

    These are my experiences and I certainly don't think it is my imagination. I believe it is a ploy on the part of manufacturers to prolong suspension life on basic suspension units . There may be other reasons but perhaps others on here have ideas.

    Of recent bikes owned the CRF1000L is an exception as it was plush enough. Obviously the top end BM's and KTM's and other manufacturers with multi adjustable suspension are also the exception, but there is an overly high premium to pay for such suspension with these marques.

    All I ask is something that is reasonably comfortable. End of rant
    Last edited by Griff; 27th October 2018 at 04:29.
    It's never too late to have a happy childhood.

  2. #2
    Super Moderator Suspension too hard on modern motorcycles. 670cc's Avatar
    Bike: NC700X, GL1800, KLX140G, CRF250L Rally, Ruckus 50
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    6,402
    Griff, I’ve not had the range of experience you’ve had with suspensions, but I have to agree that most motorcycle suspensions are too stiff. But, from reading journalist reviews and owner’s comments on forums, that seems to be what many people want, or think they want.

    I read time and time again criticisms that “the springs are too soft and the shock is underdamped.” But, an important factor usually missing from the review is the weight of the tester. If the tester weighs 250 pounds, it probably is a little soft, but if you’re a 160 pound rider, it’s probably just right. You mentioned that the CRF1000L was plush enough, but what did the media say? Too soft.

    My CRF250L Rally is soft, and I like it. People criticize the fork dive and add a second spring to the front end. Well, people, if you have 10 inches of fork travel, then yes, it’s going to dive. Why have 10 inches of travel and then stiffen it up so much it doesn’t move?

    Another factor is the smoothness of the roads you often travel. With ultra smooth highways, sure, let’s have a stiff suspension so we have a well mannered chassis. But if you frequent rough or unpaved roads, you’re going to want a suspension that actually moves to soak up the bumps.

    I have to wonder if manufacturers sometimes set the suspension stiff to cover up the fact that the suspension designs and components are simple and cheap.
    Last edited by 670cc; 27th October 2018 at 07:33.
    Greg
    GWRRA Member
    AMA Life Member
    "230,000 Mile Club"

    NanCyX . . . . . . . . . . The 250

  3. #3
    Senior Member Suspension too hard on modern motorcycles.
    Suspension too hard on modern motorcycles.
    DirtFlier's Avatar
    Bike: 2013 NC700x/w DCT
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Troy, Ohio
    Posts
    798
    Similar to cars, the magazine testers think a hot lap around a race track is the only test. Very few people do that sort of stuff because we ride modestly about 95%-98% of the time. We're just trying to get somewhere and could care less about our lap times. Unfortunately, it seems the bikes are often set-up to suit the magazine test jockeys! :-(

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Bike: NC700X
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Melbourne FL
    Posts
    292
    Quote Originally Posted by Griff View Post
    I am finding it particularly as I get older and my lower back gets more tender.
    And there you go. As the average age of motorcycle riders goes up and they approach terminal decrepitude they run into issues with the physical demands of ridding a motorcycle. Add in mods such as handlebar risers so you sit bolt upright, and highway pegs so you can't use your legs to unload the weight on your rear end, you you get a load straight up your spine every time you hit a bump. Over the almost 50 years I've been riding, suspensions haven't gotten harder, but they have become much more diverse in their quality. The NC has a cheap, nasty, nonadjustable suspension that doesn't work very well on anything other than near perfect roads. I had a Yamaha FJ-09 that had adjustable preload and dampening adjustment at both ends and could be setup to keep the tires in proper contact with the road. The electronic suspension control on the R1200GS underscores the adage of you get what you pay for.

    In the end, one can spend more to get a bike with better suspension, get a less expensive bike and do their own R&D program to upgrade the suspension (which may, or may not be cheaper or as good as spending more up front), or start doing some exercise to get in better shape.

  5. #5
    Member
    Bike: 750 XD, FLHTC, Can Am RT
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    NoVA
    Posts
    92
    Well, sadly I fit Rubenstein's profile of decrepitude. And my brand new 750 XD fits his description of, cheap, nasty non-adjustable suspension.

    I read here and on ADV Forum that it's set to factory settings for a 160 pound rider. I'm 180 lbs. and hardly squish the rear shock a bit. Cheap because they are built to a price point, others write. How come my much cheaper KLR would suck up pot holes without the spinal shock? This goes well beyond the two inch difference in travel.

    I really like my NC. But I just can not understand how Honda can build a bike with a totally crappy seat and suspension for six years without any improvement.

    OK, my rants over too.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Suspension too hard on modern motorcycles. GregC's Avatar
    Bike: 2015 NC700x DCT
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Southeast USA
    Posts
    524
    For something as important as suspension on a motorcycle, I canít understand why Honda wouldnít put a good or really good manually adjustable shock and fork springs on the bike. Paying full retail aftermarket for an Ohlins shock and Racetech fork springs costs ~$1,200 (you can pay slightly more or less). Installation take an amateur mechanic in a home garage a couple hours.

    Honda could get the parts for 50% of retail easily. Installing during manufacturing would not increase labor by any appreciable amount. So it seems they could offer the bike with Grade A suspension for very little at the time of purchase. Imagine a bike in the NCís class boasting an Ohlins shock.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  7. #7
    Member Suspension too hard on modern motorcycles. New Commuter700's Avatar
    Bike: NC700X
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    San Tan Valley, AZ
    Posts
    43
    I have to agree. This NC is the best bike I've owned so far for me. But it is not the softest ride I've owned so far. I don't think that it even comes close to the CB750 I owned, which is probably the closest relative to this bike. I spend the large majority of my miles just riding back and forth to work so most of the roads are not that bad but there is a section a few miles from work that is so cracked and warped that going over the four sets of railroad tracks in that half mile section is smoother than the rest of the road. I often try to avoid that section but it's quicker and probably safer to go that way.

    My thoughts on a hard suspension is that it may increase durability of the suspension but it may also increase wear on other parts. Since durability is the key component that I most worry and the rest of the ride isn't bad I will probably leave the suspension as is and watch the rest of the bike for problems.


    https://tinkergr.wixsite.com/website

  8. #8
    Senior Member Griff's Avatar
    Bike: X-Adventure, Triumph Explorer 1200, 1989 Honda Dominator
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Wicklow Ireland
    Posts
    1,708
    Quote Originally Posted by b_rubenstein View Post
    And there you go. As the average age of motorcycle riders goes up and they approach terminal decrepitude they run into issues with the physical demands of ridding a motorcycle. Add in mods such as handlebar risers so you sit bolt upright, and highway pegs so you can't use your legs to unload the weight on your rear end, you you get a load straight up your spine every time you hit a bump. Over the almost 50 years I've been riding, suspensions haven't gotten harder, but they have become much more diverse in their quality. The NC has a cheap, nasty, nonadjustable suspension that doesn't work very well on anything other than near perfect roads. I had a Yamaha FJ-09 that had adjustable preload and dampening adjustment at both ends and could be setup to keep the tires in proper contact with the road. The electronic suspension control on the R1200GS underscores the adage of you get what you pay for.

    In the end, one can spend more to get a bike with better suspension, get a less expensive bike and do their own R&D program to upgrade the suspension (which may, or may not be cheaper or as good as spending more up front), or start doing some exercise to get in better shape.
    I agree with some of what You say, but the price differential between a BMW and a NC is vastly greater than what it would cost to put a half decent suspension on said NC. In saying that I am not talking ESA but merely a bit of adjustment to damping settings. My X-Adv has spring and rebound damping adjustment in its forks and they work reasonably well, but the shock is the same basic unit as the NC750. Even with the better forks the X-Adv is still way cheaper than the top end bikes. Adding damping adjustment to the shock would not add too much more to the price.

    I mentioned above that a friend who recently purchased a Tracer 900 GT had the same issue with hard suspension. He is much heavier than me, and at least 20 years younger so in his case it is not an age thing. Also I mentioned that my 30 year old Dominator with only 11,000 miles on the odometer has much plusher suspension than any of my bikes started off with, and it has basic rightsideup forks. However it does also have rebound damping adjustment on the shock. So while I accept that age is playing some part in what I am experiencing, I still contend that suspension is getting harder on the lower priced motorcycles.

    I do ride rough roads and as 670 suggests that is showing up the shortcomings of modern cheap suspension. Also I agree with the aspect of basic suspension being provided for smooth roads.
    Last edited by Griff; 28th October 2018 at 11:18.
    It's never too late to have a happy childhood.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Bike: NC700X
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Melbourne FL
    Posts
    292
    As I said, I had a FJ-09 long enough to cover 4,000 miles. The suspension was much closer to the GS than the NC. Yes, pre-load and dampening rates had to be manually adjusted, and you have to have some understanding of what the adjustments do and their effect on ride and handling to make it work for you. The Yam also has the advantage of being about half the price of loaded GS.

  10. #10
    Senior Member Griff's Avatar
    Bike: X-Adventure, Triumph Explorer 1200, 1989 Honda Dominator
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Wicklow Ireland
    Posts
    1,708
    Quote Originally Posted by b_rubenstein View Post
    you have to have some understanding of what the adjustments do and their effect on ride and handling to make it work for you.
    Yes I have a full understanding of the four adjustments normally available on decent shocks and how to apply them. Likewise with fork adjustment. However when that makes little difference as I found on my former KTM (perhaps have a read over my initial post) or indeed when there are no adjustments available at all other than spring preload, then one has a problem.
    Last edited by Griff; 29th October 2018 at 03:48.
    It's never too late to have a happy childhood.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 11
    Last Post: 22nd April 2017, 13:54
  2. Replies: 14
    Last Post: 11th June 2014, 05:10
  3. Replies: 15
    Last Post: 13th July 2013, 06:45
  4. Replies: 17
    Last Post: 8th June 2013, 20:09
  5. Hard numbers, hard choices
    By StratTuner in forum NC700 General Discussion
    Replies: 90
    Last Post: 11th April 2013, 09:01

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •